Category: Conferences

  • Cameron’s Open Hardware Summit review

    The Suspect Devices “team” attended the Open Hardware Summit in New York City this past week. It was really thrilling to be around so many creative and intellectually curious people. Many of the talks in the afternoon made me realize that we in open hardware have the potential to do a lot of great work in the world by collaborating inside and outside of our field. The Public Laboratory team brought up issues about gathering data and data ownership for the general public, which we have the technology to do but perhaps this has not filtered into many communities yet. I also thought that they were correct in turning to traditional publishing in order to inform residents of their findings in low-bandwidth communities, which is a fantastic opportunity for current and former journalists to get involved in the information distribution process. In fact, this would be a great opportunity for local and regional newspapers (or anyone with a printing press and lots of stamps) to facilitate conversations in neighborhoods facing environmental damage.

    One of the more disturbing aspects of the summit was the keynote by Chris Anderson of Wired Magazine. His talk was focused on becoming a billionaire with open source by utilizing unpaid work, outsourcing as needed, and keeping your business model hierarchical. Individual contributions and code commits in open source are usually unpaid, but Mr Anderson suggested that by using branded gifts and other tokens as motivation, there would be no need to have people around to be paid. This is a horrible model. I don’t think that all situations necessarily need to be compensated but without provisions to make sure that people’s living is supported, you will only have contributors who are making money at programming already. Not only that, but the idea that businesses should strive to make billions of dollars is unsustainable both economically (as investment is not necessarily being reintroduced into the local economy) and environmentally (as businesses grow, they will continue to offshore production, which leads to a disconnect of downstream environmental impact). It continues to feed into a plutocratic economic model, instead of a distributed economic model that is so badly needed to reawaken blighted communities.

    While Leah Buechley is correct that openness for its own sake is counterproductive, so is an open source movement without ethics and sympathy. I hope that we as a community are able to nurture our own ethics that will help to support us as well as our neighborhoods and cities.

  • My takeaways from the Open Hardware Summit.

    Lucky me.
    Last week I go to go to the Open Hardware Summit in New York. I wasn’t sure I was going to be able to go to the Open Hardware Summit. It was the first day teaching my continuing ed class at PNCA. Turns out there was some flexibility so I did get to go but I had to leave early. Which was perfect. I had just the right amount of big city, new information, and being around a huge number of new people.

    One of the speakers was Ian Lesnet from Dangerous Prototypes who gave a talk on USB versus Open Source.

    http://dangerousprototypes.com/2012/10/03/open-hardware-summit-2012-usb-and-open-hardware-presentation/

     

    The sessions were recorded and are posted at http://www.ustream.tv/recorded/25743995. I felt both informed and inspired by most of them. During the breaks there was a lot of opportunity to talk to venders including Windell of Evil Mad Scientist labs who made the cool lego badges we all got. There were lots of purple boards, including the boards used by one of the speakers Erin Kennedy Also TI gave everyone one of the msp430 based launchpads.

    Afterwards there was a party where I met and had extended conversations with several people including Nathan Seidle of Sparkfun, a variety of artists, and several people who were in the process of working with smaller venders to keep the process of making open source hardware in the states as well as several who were working on moving it out. One thing I didn’t get to do was talk to Tom Igoe about updating the physical computing book, it being a school night he didn’t stay for the afterparty. Next time….

    I also managed to avoid Massimo Banzi somehow.

    As a follow up to his talk Ian and I discussed the option of using the Microchip sublicense (which we do with the eisenhower and the tad) and after reminding me about the open source (and redistributable) usb-cdc stack for the pic he invited us to go on a geek tour of new york on friday. I was supposed to spend the day with my artist friend Eva but she had to go to Provinctown and install a pretty incredible art piece. So I took the train from Brooklyn to Manhattan and only got lost once on the way. As you can see from the video we walked about 8 miles and spent most of the day on our feet but it was worth it. Thanks to Dangerous Prototypes and everyone else they drug along with us.

    http://dangerousprototypes.com/2012/10/05/global-geek-tour-new-york-2012-video/

    The tour was in some ways better than the conference in terms of connecting to new people and ideas.
    one of the tour members Yoshi (introduced in the video above) was giving out free copies of the lpc1114 arm cortex-m0 in a dip! He also had some pointers on getting code onto it and even a pointer to an arduino core written for it (though most of the details are in japanese).

    By days end, after crashing the Makerfaire setup party, and going to the east village for a decent Italian meal, I was ready to get back to Portland.

    When I got home I thought I had lost the new arm chip so I ordered 15 of them from arrow.

    Now I have a fresh plate of things to think about. And two new platforms to play with (I know the msp430 isnt new exactly).

    I plan to populate the breadboard version of the lpc1114 today and tomorrow and will probably bring it to the dorkbotpdx meeting on monday.